Studia Theologica 2016, 18(1):63-80 | DOI: 10.5507/sth.2016.0051595

Získanie príslušnosti k cirkvi sui iuris podľa platného zákonodárstva katolíckej cirkvi

Miroslav Adam

Ascription in a sui iuris Church in the Current Legislation of the Catholic Church

The author intends to analyse the discipline of the ascription of a certain sui iuris Church and the passage from a certain sui iuris Church to another after the promulga¬tion of the Codex Iuris Canonici of 1983 and of the Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium of 1990. The traditional rule that children belong to the rite of the father, in a marriage in which the parents belong to different sui iuris Churches, has never been questioned in canon law. After the promulgation of the CIC and the CCEO, which contemplate the pos¬sibility of the ascription of children in the sui iuris Church to which the mother belongs "… si ambo parentes concordi voluntate petunt", there have arisen several difficulties in this matter. More serious misunderstandings actually arise mainly in the interpretation of the above-mentioned "mutual agreement" of the parents, and their eventual implicit or explicit intention of ascription of the child in the rite to which the mother belongs.

Keywords: Rite and sui iuris Church; Belonging to the children to the rite; Mutual agreement of the parents; Ascription in a sui iuris Church; Valid passage into another sui iuris Church

Zveřejněno: březen 2016 

Zobrazit celý článek

Reference

  1. KKP - Kódex kánonického práva, latinskoslovenské vydanie, Bratislava 1996.
  2. KKVC - Kódex kánonov východných cirkví, Lublin 2012.
  3. P. Erdö, "Questioni interrituali (interecclesiali) del diritto dei sacramenti (battesimo e cresima)," Periodica de re canonica 84 (1995): 326-327.
  4. Extractus benignarum resolutionum normalium in objectis publicoecclesiasticis editarum ad annum 1833 inclusive productus, Tyrnaviae 1834.
  5. D. Reba, Izbornik za crkvenopravne odnose različitih katol. obreda s obzirom na istočno katoličku crkvu na Hrvaskoj, U Križevčima: Tiskom G. Neuberga, 1911.
  6. C. Vasiľ, Fonti canoniche della Chiesa cattolica bizantinoslava nelle eparchie di Mukačevo e Prešov a confronto con il Codex Canonum Ecclesiarum Orientalium (CCEO), Roma, 1996.
  7. M. Brogi, "I cattolici orientali nel Codex Iuris Canonici," Antonianum 58 (1983): 224.
  8. S. S. Mudryj, De transitu ad alium ritum [a byzantinoucraino ad latinum], Romae: PP. Basiliani, 1973.
  9. Collectanea S. Congregationis de Propaganda Fide seu Decreta, Instructiones, Rescripta pro Apostolicis Missionibus, vol. I, Romae, 1907.
  10. J. Pejška, Církevní právo se zřetelem k partikulárnímu právu československému, sv. I, Semily 1932.
  11. A. Tauber, Manuale Iuris canonici continuo respectu habito ad Hungariam, t. I, Sabariae: Typographia Dioecesana, 1912.
  12. D. Salachas, "L'appartenenza giuridica dei fedeli a una Chiesa orientale sui iuris o alla Chiesa latina," Periodica de re canonica 83 (1994): 28.
  13. M. Brogi, "Licenza presunta della Santa Sede per il cambiamento di Chiesa 'sui iuris'," Revista española de derecho canónico 50 (1993): 663-664. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  14. D. Salachas - K. Nitkiewicz, Rapporti interecclesiali tra cattolici orientali e latini: Sussidio canonicopastorale, Roma: Edizioni Orientalia Christiana, 2007.
  15. O. Nagy, "Interpretácia kánona 32 Kódexu kánonov východných cirkví," Duchovný pastier 82 [2001]: 75.
  16. P. Gefaell, Some Canon Law Issues on the Pastoral Care of Eastern Faithful Outside the Territory of Their Church <<sui iuris>>, in L. Lorusso - L. Sabbarese (ed), Oriente e Occidente: Respiro a due polmoni, Studi in onore di Dimitrios Salachas, Città del Vaticano: Urbaniana University Press, 2014.
  17. Pontificio consilio per i testi legislativi, "Nota explicativa quoad can. 1 CCEO," 8 December 2011, in Communicationes 34 (2011): 315-316.
  18. D. Salachas, Istituzioni di diritto canonico delle Chiese cattoliche orientali, RomaBologna: Dehoniane, 1993.
  19. D. Salachas, "Problematiche interrituali nei due Codici orientale e latino," Apollinaris 67 (1994): 647-648.
  20. J. Prader, La legislazione matrimoniale latina e orientale, Roma: Dehoniane, 1993.
  21. L. Lorusso, Lo statuto giuridico e la cura pastorale dei <<Christifideles orientales>> nel CCEO e CIC: collaborazione e problematiche interecclesiali nei due Codici, Bari: Pontificum Institutum Orientale, 1999.

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), která umožňuje distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


Zpět na obsah