Ad "Philosophy and the Religious Message"

The article is a response to Š. Holub's reply to my article "On the Relationships between Belief, Philosophy and Theology". It defends the analytical approach taken there by making a distinction between two sorts of adequacy of an approach. It is argued that the approach is adequate in the sense of analyzing and explaining some sine qua non aspects of belief; namely, statements. If essentiality of statements for belief is denied, the loss of cognitive value appears to be imminent.

Keywords: Philosophy and Theology; relationship; Logic of religion; Logical analysis in religion and theo-logy; Christian philosophy